Friday, 21 March 2014 09:11
Budget 2014: Major changes will spur need for Financial Planning
The Institute of Financial Planning says that the "momentous" changes announced in the Budget will mean a greater need for sound Financial Planning to ensure consumers avoid making potentially disastrous decisions.
The IFP says that the changes to the pension options for people who are at or in retirement announced in the Budget "momentous" and while the Institute of Financial Planning (IFP) agrees that it is good for consumers to be offered choice and flexibility in planning their retirement, including the prospect of a "guaranteed lifetime income" provided by an annuity, it is vital that the correct choice is made.
George Osborne's reported comment that: "People who have saved throughout their lives, saved for a pension, these are responsible people who are capable of making decisions - with good advice - about their future," cannot be argued with, says the IFP.
The IFP says, however, that the "with good advice" part of that sentence is critical. More work is required to define what "with good advice" actually means and IFP will add this to its ongoing discussions with FCA and Money Advice Service.
It may be a great burden to many people to have to make this decision, says the IFP, and while face to face impartial advice sounds like it should be sensible, face to face impartial advice does not necessarily mean good advice.
Given the limited budget of £20m a year for financial guidance announced in relation to this "good advice", the IFP is concerned that, with approximately 320,000 individuals retiring every year, the approximately £64 per face to face meeting will not result in a regulated, expert-led planning process that delivers what consumers need in relation to their long term plans.
{desktop}{/desktop}{mobile}{/mobile}
The moves to simplify the Isa rules and increase annual contribution limits has been welcomed by the IFP although it says that they increase the need for consumers to understand the different asset allocation options open to them, with the risk/return discussion to the fore.
The IFP says that consumers need help to understand the different types of risk and the implications they may have on their financial situation. This is especially so in a low interest rate environment given the potential this brings for reductions in the real value of assets.
The IFP maintains that planning and saving for the future is most effectively carried out with a set of clear goals having been established. Also, reviewing progress towards these goals should be a regular event and not a single moment in time.
Advice at a single moment in time raises the spectre of further mis-selling or mis-advice if it is not facilitated by suitably qualified and regulated individuals. In this context, the IFP says that "we need to be clear whether the 'face to face impartial advice' will be fully regulated advice or not."
Steve Gazzard, chief executive of the IFP, said: "These changes mean that ongoing Financial Planning advice provided by Certified Financial PlannerCM professionals and by Accredited Financial Planning FirmsTM has never been more important for those consumers approaching retirement.
"The Budget changes give consumers the ability to access their accumulated savings and investments much more flexibly in future. However, the need for them to understand the long term implications of such decisions is essential. The process a Financial Planner takes clients through, which includes cashflow forecasting and various 'what if' scenarios, supports this understanding in a way that a single moment of time piece of advice can never achieve".
The IFP says that the changes to the pension options for people who are at or in retirement announced in the Budget "momentous" and while the Institute of Financial Planning (IFP) agrees that it is good for consumers to be offered choice and flexibility in planning their retirement, including the prospect of a "guaranteed lifetime income" provided by an annuity, it is vital that the correct choice is made.
George Osborne's reported comment that: "People who have saved throughout their lives, saved for a pension, these are responsible people who are capable of making decisions - with good advice - about their future," cannot be argued with, says the IFP.
The IFP says, however, that the "with good advice" part of that sentence is critical. More work is required to define what "with good advice" actually means and IFP will add this to its ongoing discussions with FCA and Money Advice Service.
It may be a great burden to many people to have to make this decision, says the IFP, and while face to face impartial advice sounds like it should be sensible, face to face impartial advice does not necessarily mean good advice.
Given the limited budget of £20m a year for financial guidance announced in relation to this "good advice", the IFP is concerned that, with approximately 320,000 individuals retiring every year, the approximately £64 per face to face meeting will not result in a regulated, expert-led planning process that delivers what consumers need in relation to their long term plans.
{desktop}{/desktop}{mobile}{/mobile}
The moves to simplify the Isa rules and increase annual contribution limits has been welcomed by the IFP although it says that they increase the need for consumers to understand the different asset allocation options open to them, with the risk/return discussion to the fore.
The IFP says that consumers need help to understand the different types of risk and the implications they may have on their financial situation. This is especially so in a low interest rate environment given the potential this brings for reductions in the real value of assets.
The IFP maintains that planning and saving for the future is most effectively carried out with a set of clear goals having been established. Also, reviewing progress towards these goals should be a regular event and not a single moment in time.
Advice at a single moment in time raises the spectre of further mis-selling or mis-advice if it is not facilitated by suitably qualified and regulated individuals. In this context, the IFP says that "we need to be clear whether the 'face to face impartial advice' will be fully regulated advice or not."
Steve Gazzard, chief executive of the IFP, said: "These changes mean that ongoing Financial Planning advice provided by Certified Financial PlannerCM professionals and by Accredited Financial Planning FirmsTM has never been more important for those consumers approaching retirement.
"The Budget changes give consumers the ability to access their accumulated savings and investments much more flexibly in future. However, the need for them to understand the long term implications of such decisions is essential. The process a Financial Planner takes clients through, which includes cashflow forecasting and various 'what if' scenarios, supports this understanding in a way that a single moment of time piece of advice can never achieve".
This page is available to subscribers. Click here to sign in or get access.
Published in
Articles